The
current debate over ADHD medication focuses on whether the benefits --
improved concentration, better behavior, better performance in school --
outweigh the potential risks of medicating young children. Complicating
all the abuse potential of ADHD drugs, with students using them
off-label to get ahead in school and incidences of addiction, sometimes borne to tragic ends.
In the youngest children diagnosed with ADHD, parents may choose to eschew medication altogether in favor of alternative methods like changes in diet, exercise, and behavior modification programs. But a new study out
of Johns Hopkins suggests that the "benefits" used to rationalize
medication might not even exist. Or at least, don't have lasting impact.
The drugs may be just altering consciousness like alcohol does, it appears then that the person is being treated when they are just distracted by the drug's effects. This has also been suggested as to how antidepressants work, they show no efficacy better than placebo for mild to moderate depression. In an Iv-B economy small results in trials exploit tiny levels of signficance to sell drugs, when the I-O police are weak this can become like quack medicine. Over 10% of American take antidepressants the majority of which get no better results than placebo, now the same may be happening to children.
The cause may be from other statistical trials not being done, there is a suggestion that side effects from Tylenol given to children may lead to autism and perhaps ADHD.
The drugs may be just altering consciousness like alcohol does, it appears then that the person is being treated when they are just distracted by the drug's effects. This has also been suggested as to how antidepressants work, they show no efficacy better than placebo for mild to moderate depression. In an Iv-B economy small results in trials exploit tiny levels of signficance to sell drugs, when the I-O police are weak this can become like quack medicine. Over 10% of American take antidepressants the majority of which get no better results than placebo, now the same may be happening to children.
The cause may be from other statistical trials not being done, there is a suggestion that side effects from Tylenol given to children may lead to autism and perhaps ADHD.
Six
years after diagnosis, given when they were about four and a half years
old, 160 out of 180 children followed by the researchers continued to
meet the criteria for moderate to severe ADHD. Over two-thirds of the
children followed were on medication, but they met the clinical
conditions for ADHD symptoms at rates slightly higher than the kids who
hadn't been medicated (62 and 58 percent, respectively, for
hyperactivity and impulsivity, and 65 and 62 percent, respectively, for
inattention).
The
researchers can't say whether the problem was poor drug choice,
incorrect dosage, poor adherence, or medication just not being an
effective treatment for preschoolers with ADHD.
But
having repeatedly checked in with parents, educators, and
pediatricians, they were able to conclude that ADHD was chronic over the
six years of observation, and that it was characterized by severe
symptoms and impairment. For most kids, it appeared to be untreatable,
at least using the current available methods.
The
other interpretation that will probably be raised is that hyperactive
behavior is normal in preschoolers, and that ADHD is wildly overdiagnosed.
The authors write that seven percent of U.S. children are currently
being treated for the condition. Regardless of whether that number's too
high or too low, we clearly need better interventions.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.